| -ORBETELLO. "You avoid the slaughter of the sea crows in lagoon that, so much, would not serve to anything." This, in synthesis, the nth appeal of Angel Properzi of the Wwf that really he/she doesn't succeed in understanding and to share the theses of Aldi. Premised to never have wanted to offend the fishermen of the lagoon of Orbetello ("that, rather, - it sustains - it seems me him is moving with correctness asking a congruous indemnification, immediately keeping in mind of the real consistence of the damage, in accord with the Province and the Commune"), Properzi explains because the killing of the sea crows would not resolve the problems of the fishing. "Recent studies of the Infs and others on the real pressure of the sea crows - it specifies in a document to reassume the situation - they notice that to everything today nobody is able to scientifically show that in the extensive fittingses' as that of the lagoon of Orbetello the collecting of the sea crow can negatively engrave on the fished one and that the desire to shoot of some (fortunately pochissimi'pseudocacciatori', since all those people who I have felt as Aldi don't think her/it) pushes toward a solution that would bang above all with the tourist vocation of our territory. And' true - Properzi still writes - that the money of the hunters is used for the indemnifications but Aldi dimentica'volutamente' to say that the funds destined to the throwing of hares and pheasants and to the construction of aviaries also originate from the boxes of the Cones and from those of the Province. Or - the person responsible of the Wwf specifies - from corporate body that they have well other demands of expense and that however many of the appointments of the hunters are finalized a'migliorare' the possibility to chase, action that concerns few people and you/he/she doesn't invest certain the good of the whole community." |
